THE WASHINGTON TIMES NATIONAL WEEKLY EDITION PATRICK BUCHANAN The stakes in Mexico and in the GOP Just three weeks in power and Newt Gingrich and Bob Dole may be about to commit a blunder on the scale of George Bush's 1990 abandonment of his "No new taxes!" pledge. Make no mistake: Rage against that $40 billion Mexico City-Wall Street bailout is catching fire. Unlike the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), this one is easy to understand. And it has nuclear potential. Republican collaboration in this ultimate insiders' deal could be the decisive act that kills the Spirit of November '94 and creates a Third Party. Why are Newt and Bob putting at risk all the hopes wrapped up in the new Republican Congress? Comes the reply: If Mexico does not get $40 billion, pronto it will not be able to pay offits oid loans. Well, excuse me, but so what? If Mexico City can't pay off her old loans, Mexico isn't going to disappear. Her people aren't going to starve. The banker-blockheads who loaned Mexico City the money will simply have to roll over their lousy loans. Instead of putting taxpayers on the hook for medium-term loans, to pay back short-term Mexican loans coming due, let the Wall Street banks work it out with their feckless Mexican clients. And keep us out of the loop. This bailout is corporate socialism. The Big Banks "privatize" their profits from loan- sharking in the Third World, and "socialize" their debts--i.e. dump them into the laps of tax- payers. These fellows are terrific at giving speeches on the glories of the "global free market." Now, let them test its bracing waters, in mid-January. Only if America's parasitical financial elite is made to pay the price of its follies, will those follies ever end. And no more necessary mes- sage could be sent to Third World regimes that loot foreign investors, then to say to Mexico: "OK, boys, you lied to us; you took our folks to the cleaners. Now, bail yourselves out! Because the gravy train doesn't stop here anymore." Mr. Dole said on "Meet the Press" last Sunday he did not want to put U.S. taxpayers at risk. Fine, Bob, then don't put them at risk. Some Republicans are cobbling together a "compromise: We will support the loan guaran- tees, they say, only if Mexico puts up its oil as collateral, only if they agree to restore the peso to 3.5 to the dollar, only if they broaden economic reforms, etc. Forget it, fellas. You cannot bribe a corrupt partner into behaving honorably, by making good his bar bill, gambling bill and Visa bill, all run up while he was bilking the firm. For the United States to put "conditions" on its loans to Mexico is but a massive bribe to Mexico City to act responsibly. It won't work. It is interference in the affairs of a country we cannot run, that will only earn us the hatred of the Mexican people, as they endure the hardships brought upon them by their untrustworthy and deceitful government. Let Mexi- co City face the music. What should the Republicans do? What Democrats would do in the same situation: Nail responsibility for this debacle right where it belongs--on Bill Clinton and Robert Rubin. Who was the $25 miUion-a-year chief executive who led the investors of Goldman Sachs into Third World securities? Robert Rubin. Who was in charge of the While House "Economic Security Council" that was supposed to monitor the Mexican situation? Robert Rubin. Mr. Rubin was in the crow's nest when we hit tke reef Elevating Mr. Rubin to secretary of the Treasury is like promoting the captain of the Exxon Valdez to run the entire tanker fleet. Why doesn't Newt demand Mr. Rubin's resignation? Why don't the Republicans raise the ques tion: If we are suddenly on the verge of some horrific financial crisis, who steered us to the edge of the abyss? Republicans ought to admit they were deceived on the North American Free Trade Agreement, and demand the heads of the deceivers. NAFTA's critics were right all along: The Mexican peso was not worth three-to-the-dollar. Carlos Salinas' crowd was never the corruption-free, hugely competent, regime sold to Congress by Mexico City's Washington lobbyists. We went into partnership with an unworthy partner. It's time to repeal NAFTA, cut our losses, and get out. Mr. Clinton told us NAFTA was a cure for America's crisis of illegal immigration. He now tells us to expect 430,000 additional invaders if we do not add $40 billion in loan guarantees to the $18 billion package of Mr. Rubin. This is an abdication of the president's constitutional duty to defend America's borders. We gave 10,000 troops in Haiti. If they are needed here, bring them home. Time to tell Mr. Clinton: If you are incapable of fulfilling your obligation to defend the states of the Union from foreign invasion, it's tirne the nation got a new commander in chief. Patrick Buchanan is a nation ally syndicated columnist. JANUARY 30 - FEBRUARY 5, 1995 33